最新なAdobe AD0-E556問題集（52題）、真実試験の問題を全部にカバー！

質問 1：
Refer to the case study.
UNICORN FINTECH COMPANY PROFILE
Unicorn Fintech is a mobile-only financial-servicesstartup created by a consortium of consumer banks to resell savings, checking, loan, transfer/remittance, and other services from a secure smartphone app. The company is venture-funded, and plans to reach profitability before a planned IPO in two years.
Business issues and requirements
Marketing is responsible for acquiring new customers 0 through online, television advertising, and email campaigns, and for cross-selling new services to customers through IM, email, and in-app campaigns.
Evaluating the success of these campaigns has been a persistent problem: although the company can track revenue by product line, it can't attribute those revenues to campaigns: for example, did a new loan come from onboarding a new customer, or by cross-selling a savings-account customer? Marketing currently uses crude, manual tools and guesswork to evaluate the quality and lifespan of new leads, and even the deliverability of emails in its external campaigns. As a result, the department can't allocate spending to the most productive campaigns, or decide how much different touchpoints in multi-stage campaigns contribute to revenue. Operational processes to connect lead data to CRM and other databases are entirely manual.
Staffing and leadership
Unicorn has fewer than 200 employees, and roles aren't always defined in traditional ways. Since customer acquisition and cross-selling are primarily through electronic channels, Marketing and IT roles especially often overlap. The traditional Sales role falls entirely to Marketing, and IT is responsible for the Salesforce CRM system, Google Analytics, and a handful of third-party integrations. The CMO and CIO work closely together on most initiatives, and budgets are typically project-driven rather than fixed annually. Individual contributors to Marketing campaigns include the Marketing Operations Manager, responsible for lead scoring and analytics. Key IT contacts include the CRM Administrator and Web Developer. Incidental contributors are the Corporate Attorney, who signs off on opt-in/out and DMARC policies.
Revenue sources
Unicorn earns commissions on financial services delivered by the banking consortium through its apps, including fixed finders' fees for what the company calls "skips"-customers who initially engage with Unicorn, but then "skip" to receive services directly from a consortium bank. Unicorn needs to attribute revenue from these customers to its own campaigns; currently, it's impossible to attribute ROI to individual campaigns, or provide documentation to claim commissions on "skips." Current and aspirational marketing technology Current Marketing technology consists of Marketable,an open-source lead management solution supported by a set of spreadsheets and scripts developed in-house. Marketable offers lead tracking and source attribution, but not multi-touch source attribution. Unicorn Fintech Marketing has difficulty linking the different stages of customer campaign journeys, and relies on scripts to translate Marketable's "sales alerts" into next steps it could use in multi-touch campaigns. IT has worked out scripts to input Marketable qualified leads into Salesforce, but the system is brittle and often requires manual intervention.
Current campaign management processes
A typical email campaign:
* Addresses a purchased (for customer acquisition) or0 in-house (for cross-sell) list. Purchased lists range from
300,000 to 1.5 million addresses
* Is sent from multiple data centers in the US and Canada
* Includes an "unsubscribe" opt-out below the message
* Is static; there are no formula fields
* Uses no deliverability authentication, nor integration 0 with any email management platform.
All campaigns to date direct respondents to a single 0 landing page with the company's "all markets" message.
More sophisticated targeting is a high priority.
Current lead management and attribution
Unicorn's lead-management process follows
Marketable's "out of the box" defaults: lead evaluation levels 1 through 3, lifecycle stages "unqualified" and
"qualified." The qualification processes are manual, and highly subjective: Marketing staff classify leads according to prospect email responses, including free-form comments. "Sales" followup is by email forms prompting higher levels of engagement. The company intends to phase out Marketable and replace spreadsheets and scripts with native features of whatever solution set it adopts.
Attribution processes are binary: response to a campaign email or web visit is rated a success if it results in a sale: there is no success rating assigned to TV ads that result in web visits, for example. Cost are not allocated to individual campaigns.
The Marketing department plans to expand outreach to social media (Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, in-house and third-party financial blogs), and wants to make sure it can assess the ROI of these channels, and the overall social media program.
Current governance processes
Currently, the Marketing department assigns content development and campaign management duties to team members on a campaign-by-campaign basis. All team members (and IT) have access to all assets and tools, which sometimes leads to duplication and conflicts. The CMO realizes that a more specialization will be necessary to support the social media campaigns, but hasn't decided on the optimal organizational model.
Input of qualified leads from Marketable into
Salesforce is by manual cut-and-paste, assisted by scripts; inconsistency of input practices across Marketing team members is a known problem; individual members have their own "go-to" fields: where one member might check "TV ad" as Lead Source, another would put that in the comments field.
CMO
The CMO's most important concerns are:
* The current solution has too many manual steps to scale with anticipated growth
* Without more sophisticated attribution, the company will overinvest in less productive campaigns, and underinvest in better ones
* In general, analytics integrations are manual, slow, and unreliable
* The current system completely misses "skips"-customers switching from the Unicorn app to consortium banks-an important source of revenue
* Documenting the value of Unicorn's Marketing processes is essential to the success of the planned IPO, and millions of dollars in stock valuation hangs in the balance.
CIO
The CIO is concerned primarily with:
* The amount of time his team spends patching up Marketing campaigns and CRM data transfers, at the expense of other, critical initiatives
* Quality and reliability of the Analytics information his team provides to Marketing MARKETING STAFF Marketing Operations staff concerns:
* Campaigns require so much work that they can't run as many of them as they need to
* Multi-touch cross-selling campaigns (for example, savings accounts to loans) with excellent margins, but no way to know which campaign touches perform best
* Getting swamped with manual record-keeping; for example, spreadsheet mistakes take hours to find and fix
* Poor integration with third-party tools for preparing, sending, and evaluating campaign materials, for Example.
o Webhook not firing,
o Reaching API limit
o Synchronization errors with third-party tools and Salesforce
* Inadequate number of lead stages and qualification levels, making it difficult to evaluate lead value, especially in multi-touch campaigns Despite the absence of an external Sales team, Marketing Operations would like to improve the granularity of their lead tracking, including both lifecycle stages and quality levels, with "no score" and negative levels.
Unicorn Fintech launches a new paid subscription app where users can sign up to read financial advice. Access to Unicorn Fintech's new app is renewed each year, and the App User Expiry Date is a date field that is updated hourly from CRM to Adobe Marketo Engage. Another string type field called App User Status changes to a status of "Current" in Marketo Engage when the App User's access becomes valid, and changes to
"Lapsed" if the App User fails to renew.
The Marketing team wants to add App Users who have not yet renewed to an Engagement Program to nurture them 2 months prior to their App User Expiry Date, and then remove the App User from the nurture if they renew.
Which smart campaign setup is the most efficient to manage adding the App User to the nurture?
A. Build a scheduled batch Smart Campaign, use a Wait Step with a Date Token, and then Add to Engagement Program
B. Build a triggered Smart Campaign, use a Wait Step with a specific date, and then Change Engagement Program Cadence
C. Build a scheduled batch Smart Campaign, use a Wait Step with a specific date, and then Change Engagement Program Cadence
D. Build a triggered Smart Campaign, use a Wait Step with a Date Token, and then Add to Engagement Program
正解：D
解説: (Pass4Test メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 2：
The VP of Marketing is concerned about the workload of the marketing team and wants to hire an agency to assist the team by building campaigns and programs within their Adobe Marketo Engage instance. The biggest concern is adding users who may be able to access and accidentally break established templates, nurture campaigns, and scoring. Therefore, the users will only be able to work in the Marketing Activities area.
The agency will have access to building programs, campaigns, emails, and landing pages.
What is the best set of user role permissions for the agency users?
A. Web Campaign Editor, Access Email, Activate Trigger Campaign, Clone Marketing Asset
B. Access Email, Access Landing Page, Web Campaign Editor, Edit Marketing Asset
C. Edit Marketing Asset, Edit Campaign, Activate Trigger Campaign, Clone Marketing Asset
D. Edit Marketing Asset, Access Email, Access Landing Page, Export Analytics Data
正解：B

質問 3：
An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect at Cookieless Monsters Inc. is creating a report on Revenue Explorer to track Marketing Influence on Opportunity Closed-Won by First-Touch (FT) and Multi-Touch (MT) attribution models of Marketo Engage.
Which two factors should the Architect consider while setting up FT and MT attribution reports on Revenue Explorer? (Choose two.)
A. Credit is not split evenly, and credit cannot be given for something that happened in the past.
B. FT attribution answers, "Which programs are good at acquiring profitable new names?" and MT answers, "Which programs are most influential in moving people forward in the sales cycle over time?"
C. Credit is split evenly, and credit cannot be given for something that happened in the past.
D. Credit can be manually assigned, and credit can be given for something that happened in the past.
E. FT attribution answers, "Which programs are most influential in moving people forward in the sales cycle over time?" and MT answers, "Which programs are good at acquiring profitable new names?"
正解：B,C
解説: (Pass4Test メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 4：
An enterprise software company sells its products directly to its B2B customers but also sells their product through third-party sellers. The company runs marketing campaigns directly to their B2B target audience.
They also provide funds to the third-party sellers to run campaigns on the company's behalf. In return, the leads and engagement are provided by the third-party seller when a campaign is complete. Any data must be passed to Salesforce due to reporting being done in Salesforce.
Programs and channels should be set up to report on the efficacy of direct marketing and investment to third-party seller/partner marketing to determine how budget should be spent the following year.
How should this requirement be met?
A. One set of channels should be created, and separate program statuses should be used to designate Direct or Partner
B. One set of channels should be created, and a tag should be used to determine Direct or Partner
C. Two sets of event based channels should be created: one set for direct marketing and the otherfor third-party seller marketing
正解：A
解説: (Pass4Test メンバーにのみ表示されます)

質問 5：
An Adobe Marketo Engage Architect has just hired a new person to join their team. They have been tasked with building a new lifecycle model and you work together to develop a solution. The top half of the funnel stages (Known, Engaged, MQL) will be driven by Marketo Engage where as the bottom half of the funnel will be driven by specific data value changes in salesforce. Due to this quarter's budget reasons, there were not enough funds to subscribe to Revenue Explorer or Bizible but it will be prioritized for the next fiscal year.
Which scalable approach should the Architect choose to ensure that the lifecycle model is tracking lead stage changes accurately?
A. Build trigger logic in a program. Build the triggers in the Revenue Cycle Model to listen for stage changes driven by the program.
B. Build a program to listen to the movement driven by the Revenue Cycle Model.
C. Build trigger logic within the Revenue Cycle Model.
D. Build trigger logic in a program.Create a field for revenue stage and a date field for each stage to track date of entry into that field.
正解：C
解説: (Pass4Test メンバーにのみ表示されます)