You have recently configured an aggregated Ethernet interface between two devices in your network. The member links do not all reside within the same PFE complex. You must ensure that the bandwidth and burst size defined in a policer applied to this aggregated Ethernet interface are properly enforced when the traffic falls out of profile.
Which configuration parameter should you use?
A. shared-bandwidth-policer
B. committed-information-rate
C. physical-interface-policer
D. committed-burst-size
正解:A
質問 2:
Click the Exhibit button.

As a network administrator, you are asked to configure the VPN-B routing instance so that P routers are masked in CE2-to-CE5 trace routes. For the VPN-A routing instance, P routers should appear in CE1-to-CE4 trace routes.
Referring to the exhibit, which two actions achieve this task? (Choose two.)
A. Add the no-vrf-propagate-ttl statement on egress router PE2.
B. Add the no-vrf-propagate-ttl statement on transit router P.
C. Add the no-vrf-propagate-ttl statement to the VPN-B routing instance on PE1.
D. Add the no-vrf-propagate-ttl statement to the VPN-B routing instance on PE2.
正解:B,C
解説: (Pass4Test メンバーにのみ表示されます)
質問 3:
Click the Exhibit button.
user@router# run show route 2.0.0.0/8
inet.0: 101 destinations, 198 routes (100
active, 0 holddown, 1 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
2 .0.0.0/8 *[BGP/170] 00:12:06, MED
1 000, Localpref 100, from 10.220.1.2
As path: 2000 I,
validation-state: unverified
> to 10.220.15.2 via ge-
1 /0/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3
to 10.220.12.2 via ge-
1 /1/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3
[BGP/170] 00:12:10, MED
1 000, localpref 100, from 10.220.1.5
AS path: 2000 I,
validation-state: unverified
> to 10.220.15.2 via ge-
1 /0/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3
to 10.220.12.2 via ge-
1/1/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3
2.6.6.6/32 *[BGP/170] 00:12:06, MED
1000, localpref 100, from 10.220.1.2
AS path: 2000 I,
validation-state: unverified
> to 10.220.15.2 via ge-
1 /0/0.0, label-switched-path r1-tor3
to 10.220.12.2 via ge-
1 /1/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3
[BGP/170] 00:12:10, MED
1 000, localpref 100, from 10.220.1.5
AS path: 2000 I,
validation-state: unverified
> to 10.220.15.2 via ge-
1 /0/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3
to 10.220.12.2 via ge-
1 /1/0.0, label-switched-path r1-to-r3
user@router# run show route advertising-protocol
bgp 192.168.11.0
inet.0: 101 destinations, 198 routes (100
active, 0 holddown, 1 hidden)
Prefix Nexthop
MED Lclpref AS path
* 2.6.6.6/32 Self
2 000 I
[edit protocols bgp]
user@router# show
export reject;
group peer {
export as1000;
neighbor 192.168.11.0 {
family inet {
unicast;
}
peer-as 1000;
}
}
[edit policy-options]
user@router# show
policy-statement as1000 {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 2.0.0.0/8 longer;
}
then accept;
}
term 2 {
then reject;
}
}
policy-statement reject {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 2.0.0.0/8 exact;
}
then reject
}
}
You want to advertise routes 2.0.0.0/8 and 2.6.6.6/32 to BGP peer 192.168.11.0.
Referring to the exhibit, which configuration change would satisfy this requirement?
A. Change the as1000 policy to orlonger.
B. Change the reject policy to longer.
C. Delete the as1000 export policy.
D. Delete the reject export policy.
正解:A
解説: (Pass4Test メンバーにのみ表示されます)
質問 4:
-- Exhibit -

-- Exhibit --
Click the Exhibit button.
The exhibit displays an IS-IS topology and IS-IS-related outputs for R1 and R2. The IS-IS adjacencies between R2 and R3 are in the Up state, but the IS-IS adjacency between R1 and R2 does not attempt to form.
Which two actions will ensure that all IS-IS adjacencies (R1 to R2 and R2 to R3) reach and stay in the Up state? (Choose two.)
A. Change the area ID on R2 to 49.1111.
B. Enable Level 1 operations for all of R2's interfaces.
C. Change the selector value on R1 to 01.
D. Enable Level 2 operations for all of R1's interfaces.
正解:A,D
質問 5:
A service provider wants to start using all of their LSPs for internal traffic and not just their MPLS VPNs. Any solution must ensure that existing VPNs and routing policies will continue to function properly.
Which MPLS traffic engineering parameter would accomplish this task?
A. mpls-forwarding
B. bgp-igp
C. bgp-igp-both-ribs
D. bgp
正解:C
解説: (Pass4Test メンバーにのみ表示されます)



0 お客様のコメント