Click the Exhibit button.
PIM trace on R1:

You have configured PIM on R1. However, you notice that multicast traffic to 225.20.0.1/32 is dropped. Referring to the exhibit, what is the problem?
A. Reverse-path forwarding check is failing.
B. The output displayed does not identify any dropped traffic.
C. The source is a non-Juniper device.
D. Source-specific multicast (SSM) must be configured.
正解:A
質問 2:
Click the Exhibit button.

Referring to the exhibit, you have been asked to troubleshoot a class of service (CoS) problem where an interface is dropping some expedited-forwarding (EF) packets during congestion.
Which two statements describe what is happening? (Choose two.)
A. The default CoS output scheduler is in use.
B. EF packets are dropped because the exp-default classifier maps EF packets to queue 1.
C. EF packets are dropped because the ipprec-compatibility classifier maps EF packets to queue
1.C. The default CoS input scheduler is in use.
正解:A,B
質問 3:
You have applied a customized EXP rewrite rule on router R1 on the egress of the interface connecting to router R2. You want to verify if it is working properly. Which two methods would you use to accomplish this task? (Choose two.)
A. Use an input firewall filter on R2 that matches and counts on various EXP values on packets coming from R1.
B. Apply a rewrite rule on the ingress of R2 for packets coming in from R1 and count those packets for the new EXP values with a firewall filter as they leave R2.
C. Use an output filter on R1 that matches and counts on various EXP values on packets going to R2.
D. Use the traceroute utility.
正解:A,C
質問 4:
You have configured an MPLS LSP but it will not establish because of a failed CSPF computation. What are two reasons for this happening? (Choose two.)
A. The path for the LSP does not have enough bandwidth available.
B. An indirect loose hop is specified in the ERO.
C. BFD has been enabled for the IGP on the LSRs.
D. Ingress and egress routers are in different OSPF areas.
正解:A,D
質問 5:
Click the Exhibit button.
-- Exhibit -
user@router# show policy-options
policy-statement isis-export { term 1 { from { route-filter 172.22.135.0/8 orlonger reject; route-filter 172.22.135.0/24 orlonger accept; } then reject; } term 2 { from { protocol isis; route-filter 10.0.0.0/8 longer; route-filter 10.0.0.0/24 longer accept; } then reject; }
}
-- Exhibit -
You are asked to block the 10.0.0.0/8 IS-IS routes from being redistributed into other protocols.
You still want the existing 10.0.0.0/25 IS-IS routes to continue to be redistributed. You have applied an export policy as shown in the exhibit, however, the 10.0.0.0/8 routes are still being redistributed.
What is causing the problem?
A. The policy can only evaluate a single route-filter match for each term.
B. Term 2 should be inserted before term 1.
C. When the route-filter matching process occurs, the most specific route-filter prefix evaluation is accepting the routes.
D. When the route-filter matching process occurs, the least specific route-filter prefix evaluation is rejecting the routes.
正解:C
質問 6:

Referring to the exhibit, which statement is true about the multicast state on R3?
A. R3 has no route to RP.
B. R3 has no PIM neighbors.
C. R3 is not receiving any traffic
D. R3 has no receivers.
正解:C
898 お客様のコメント





小岛** -
JN0-692の問題集を解いて、色々参考になりました!試験に受かる気がします!